The truth about florocarbon tippets



Two types of monofilament lines make up the bulk of tippet material. They are nylon and fluorocarbon. There is also hybrid lines known us copolymers. I will explain the differences later.

All types of modern tippet materials have more in common than sets them apart. They are all extremely thin and, for such diameters, they offer impressive strength and durability. The modern tippet lines are all impressive and a massive improvement the horse hair or silkworm gut lines my great grandfather had to use.

While modern tippet is amazing, there are some differences between nylon monofilament (mono) and fluorocarbon. Let’s discuss them below.

Transparency in water

Viability in water is the big one. This is also the only category where fluorocarbon has a probable advantage over mono. Whenever I pick up a spool of flurocarbon I immediately see claims how Fluro is invisible in the water. That its refraction rating is close to water, making it nearly invisible. Trout struggle to see it…..

Let’s start with the truth, florocarbon refraction is very close to water. So to our eyes, it is a lot less visible than nylon based monofilaments. It probably also harder for trout to see.

But refraction is not everything, there is also reflection. Refraction is how light bends through the material, reflection is how light bounces of. I have yet to see any evidence that florocarbon reflects light any less than mono.

Finally. Both types of line have the potential to cast shadows over the water. The shadow moving over them is what I suspect actually spooks the fish. Luckily, the tippet we use are all very thin, and are unlikely to cast a visible shadow in all but the sunniest and gin clear conditions.

Mono vs Fluorocarbon abrasion resistance

All the adverts claim fluorocarbon has improved abrasion resistance. This is simply not the case. Both types of line are very close, and many tests comparing the two presents monofilament as the clear winner.

Abrasion resistant is also not a big concern for me while trout fishing. Trout do not have rough skin, or sharp teeth. While brown trout certainly fight dirty, the rivers and lakes we fish in usually lack the sharp barnacles and sea shell which cause the majority of abrasion when fishing.

When we lose a trout because of abrasion, it is usually because it wraps us around a branch or through thick weeds. No amount of improved resistance is going to prevent that.

Does mono or fluorocarbon have better knot strength?

Mono simply has stronger knots than fluorocarbon. Mono is usually softer, which allows the knots to tighten down more securely.

In saying that, there are plenty of knots which work just fine in fluorocarbon.

Nylon floats, floro sinks

The common reputation is that nylon floats, making it good for surface presentations. While fluro sinks, making it good for nymphs.

Well, they actually once the water tension is broken they both sink. Neither is positivity buoyant. Nylon does sink slower than fluorocarbon.

Some people like to use a short section of fluorocarbon on their tippet when dry fly fishing, they believe it helps sink through the surface and does not ‘bulge’ the surface like monofilament making it less visible for the trout.

Does mono stretch more than floro?

Diameter for the most part determines the amount of stretch in the line. So 4X mono stretches comparably to 4X fluorocarbon. There is not much of a difference there.

One thing, is that fluorocarbon has memory. Every time you stretch it, the line remembers and it slowly elongates. Although, to be fair, monofilament when wet has that in common.

Environmental concerns.

Monofilament breaks down a lot quicker than fluorocarbon. That lost fluorocarbon tippet could take centuries before its breaks down entirely.

Fluorocarbon is more resistant to UV, which means if you kept the spool out in the sun it would last for longer than a spool of nylon. Although, I store mine inside my vest, where it is dark and cool. It never really sees the light so that is a non-issue.

Can I use mainline for tippet?

Whenever I use heavier tippet, say 1X or 2X I use mainline quality monofilament. It works just fine, while I do use ‘branded’ fly fishing tippet for thinner diameters, I honestly can not say one way or the other if the extra cost can be justified. But I do find the small tippet spools fit nicely in my vest.

I tell myself, that the expensive tippet spools high higher tolerances. So there should be less tolerance in the dimensions within the line. But, I have meet several fly fishermen who for decades have been using Maxima Ultragreen mainline as their tippet.

One day, I plan on doing a side by side test. To see if there is any noticeable differences, but until then I have see no evidence to justify why tippet spools cost so much more.

Which brand of tippet

Fly fishing is very tribal. There is a high chance that fishermen would continue to buy the brands the trust. When I first started trout fishing, I was told by a very well respected and experienced guide that he only fishes Rio Powerflex monofilament and Seaguar fluorocarbon because they were the best.

Being young and poor at the time. I brought whatever I could find on special. So I have fished with most of the best brands including Rio, Cortland, Umpqua, Airflo, ultragreen, stroft and probably several others. For the most part, they are all basically the same. I do not think the branding on the spool matters that much. A few years back, I did some strength tests, and at the same diameter, they all broke within the same ballpark.

To be completely honest, I now buy monofilament based on X rating (diameter) and price. Although I do favor the spools which comes with the little material covers which holds the line in place and prevent it from flying everywhere.

Florocarbon is a bit of a different story. I have tried some terrible cheaper floros. They were too stiff with terrible memory and pathetic knot strength. I rarely fish florocarbon, but when I do I spend the extra to buy a quality spool. I have had good experiences with Rio Flouroflex and Airflo Sightfree.

A quick word in selecting the best tippet weight

When fly fishing, we select the tippet based on its dimensions, not on its breaking strain. The dimension is based on the size of the fly you plan on casting, not on the weight of the fish you hope to land. It is also worth noting, that the tippet diameter must be close to, but not larger than the diameter at the end of the leader. There needs to be a smooth and fairly consistent transition from flyline, to leader to tippet.

The dimension of the tippet needs to be in balance with the fly you are wishing to cast. If you are fishing a size 10 dry fly then you will want to be fishing a 3X or .007″ tippet. The smaller the fly, the higher the X number and the thinner the tippet.

The X system is a guideline to quickly figure out the dimension of tippet which will give you the best transfer energy from the fly line through the leader all the way to the fly. There is a little wiggle room, maybe go up one size if fishing a very heavy tungsten bead nymph or could even get away with dropping a size if fishing with a miniscule dry. But you certainly do not want to be fishing a size 2 streamer of 7X or a size 20 dry on a 0X. Just too much difference.

Line Dimension
Inches
Dimension
mm
Corresponding
fly size
0X.011″0.28mm1
1X.010″0.25mm2, 4
2X.009″0.23mm6
3X.007″0.20mm8,10
4X.006″0.18mm12
5X.005″0.15mm14, 16
6X.006″0.12mm18
7X.005″0.10mm20,22
8X.003″0.08mm24

Disclaimer:  Some of our pages contain affiliate links. At no cost to you, Troutresource may receive commission from purchases made through such links.  Here at Troutresource we try are hardest to give unbias advice and gear recommendations independent on whether we earn a commission or not. 

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *